Simple Servo System Block Diagram: Finding , from Overshoot and Time Constant, then , , ,
A standard “simple servo system” under unity feedback is typically modeled as a second-order closed-loop system whose step response is governed by the characteristic polynomial
For a standard second-order form matching coefficients gives the key relations:
We will use the standard closed-loop step-response relationships for a dominant underdamped second-order system () to connect time-domain specs (overshoot, time constant/decay) to .
Key system-step metrics used
Assumption (typical in such problems): “time constant s” refers to the exponential decay constant of the underdamped response, i.e.
So,
If your specific course notes define “time constant” differently (e.g., based on where is the real part of the poles), it still maps to the same exponential decay rate for the standard second-order model.
We will also interpret overshoot as percent maximum overshoot:
Second-Order System Step Response: Overshoot, Rise Time, Peak Time, Settling Time
(i) For : find and to achieve overshoot and time constant s
Step 1: Use the maximum overshoot formula to get
For an underdamped second-order step response, percent overshoot is
Set :
Take natural log:
So
Compute the RHS constant:
Numerically,
Thus
Rearrange:
Square both sides:
So
Hence
So the damping ratio required for overshoot is approximately:
Step 2: Use the time constant condition to get
Given then
So
Therefore
Step 3: Match coefficients to obtain and
Coefficient matching for vs. gives:
Compute :
Compute :
So
Note: In many servo-system problems, the given plant parameters are inserted directly into the closed-loop characteristic equation. If your diagram uses in building that polynomial, then may affect how map into the denominator. However, once the closed-loop characteristic polynomial is explicitly of the form , the above matching is the correct second-order spec-matching method.
type="tip" title="Coefficient matching shortcut" content="For written as : set and , then use overshoot and decay relations to solve for and ."
type="warning" title="Definition of “time constant” matters" content="If your course defines time constant as where is the real pole part, then and matches this solution. If a different definition is used, may change."
(ii) For : determine , , , and
We now use the second-order parameters obtained above (or re-derived under the assumption that the same design specs apply). Since the question statement changes only to , the only consistent way to compute time-domain response quantities is that the closed-loop dynamics correspond to the second-order model with the damping ratio and determined by the design conditions.
Thus we proceed with:
Step 1: Damped natural frequency
For underdamped second-order systems,
Compute :
So
Therefore
Step 2: Peak time
Peak time for an underdamped second-order step response is
So
Hence
Step 3: Rise time
A common textbook approximation for rise time (for ) is
Compute :
Then
So
Step 4: Settling time
For the standard settling-time criterion, the approximation is
But from part (i), so
Thus
From specs to second-order parameters and time metrics
Overshoot → ζ
1Use with ."
Time constant → ωₙ
2Use to get ."
a and b
3Match to ."
Compute response times
4, , approx, ."
Compute $a$, $b$, then $t_r$, $t_p$, $\omega_d$, $t_{ss}$
- 1Step 1
Use to get .
- 2Step 2
With , compute rad/s.
- 3Step 3
Set and .
- 4Step 4
Use rad/s.
- 5Step 5
Use s, s, and s.
Servo second-order step response quick checks
Knowledge Check
For a standard second-order system, which coefficient match is correct for ?
Explore Related Topics
Hysteresis in Sensors: Meaning, Interpretation, and Correct Option
Hysteresis in sensors is the path‑dependent error where the output at a given input differs depending on whether the input is rising or falling.
- Defined as the output difference (y_{\uparrow}(x) - y_{\downarrow}(x)) for the same input (x).
- Detected by recording sensor readings during an upward sweep, then repeating the same points on the downward sweep and comparing the values.
- Distinct from time delay (latency), dead band, repeatability, and random noise, which involve timing, insensitivity, or randomness rather than directional output shifts.
- Expressed as an absolute value or percent of full scale and impacts calibration accuracy and measurement uncertainty.
Jacobian Matrix in Inverse Kinematics & Motion Control: Advantages, Limitations, and the Role of Link Inertia Tensor in Stability
Transfer Function of a Translational Mechanical System: $\displaystyle G(s)=\frac{V_1(s)}{F(s)}$