OSI vs TCP/IP: Which Layer(s) Are Added? (Presentation, Session, or Both?)
To compare the OSI model with the TCP/IP (Internet) model, focus on how the upper-layer responsibilities are grouped. In OSI, the Presentation layer and Session layer are distinct layers, but in the classic TCP/IP model these responsibilities are not separated into two independent layers; instead, they are typically folded into the Application layer. Therefore, the OSI layers that are additional relative to TCP/IP are the Presentation layer and Session layer—i.e., (iv) Both session layer and presentation layer.
A useful way to remember this mapping is: OSI splits “application-side” concerns into finer-grained layers, while TCP/IP combines them.
Key keyword: OSI layer that handles data representation (e.g., encoding/format) and often encryption/compression.
Key keyword: OSI layer that manages establishment, maintenance, and termination of communication sessions.
Key keyword: Internet protocol stack that groups application-side functions mostly under the Application layer.
Note: Different textbooks sometimes draw the mapping slightly differently, but the standard conceptual conclusion remains: OSI’s extra separation at the top corresponds to Presentation + Session being “combined” into Application in TCP/IP.
OSI Model Explained (Layers & Functions)
OSI upper layers (what they do)
In the OSI model, the Presentation layer and Session layer provide services beyond “pure application logic”:
- keyword: converts between formats/encodings and can perform encryption/decryption or data compression.
- keyword: establishes sessions, coordinates dialog control, and handles session synchronization and orderly termination.
- keyword: provides network services that applications use (e.g., email, web, file transfer).
This separation is why OSI has more conceptual layers than TCP/IP.
TCP/IP upper layers (how it groups responsibilities)
In the TCP/IP model, the top is commonly represented as fewer layers:
- Application layer: includes functions that OSI distributes among Application + Presentation + Session.
- TCP/IP emphasizes transport and internetworking layers (Transport and Internet) while bundling many application-side concerns together.
So, OSI’s Presentation and Session layers are effectively “additional” because TCP/IP does not present them as separate layers.
Decide which OSI layer(s) are added vs TCP/IP
- 1Step 1
OSI explicitly defines Presentation and Session as separate layers.
- 2Step 2
TCP/IP groups presentation- and session-like concerns into its Application layer.
- 3Step 3
Since TCP/IP does not list separate Presentation and Session layers, these are the additional ones.
- 4Step 4
Therefore the correct option is (iv) Both session layer and presentation layer.
Quick memory trick
If OSI says “Presentation” + “Session,” but TCP/IP only shows a single “Application” layer on top, then OSI’s “extra” fine-grained layers are Presentation + Session.
Textbook variations
Some diagrams may label the TCP/IP Application layer as including “presentation/session functions.” So the conceptual mapping is consistent even if the diagram wording differs.
Layer grouping idea (OSI splits more; TCP/IP groups more)
Separate layers
OSIApplication, Presentation, Session are distinguished."
Grouped layers
TCP/IPPresentation + Session responsibilities are absorbed into Application."
Exam-style FAQ
OSI upper layers vs TCP/IP grouping (conceptual)
TCP/IP typically groups Presentation + Session into Application.
Knowledge Check
This layer is an addition to OSI model when compared with TCP/IP model. Which option is correct?