OSI vs TCP/IP: Which Layer(s) Are Added? (Presentation, Session, or Both?)

OSI vs TCP/IP: Which Layer(s) Are Added? (Presentation, Session, or Both?)

Verified Sources
Nov 4, 2026

To compare the OSI model with the TCP/IP (Internet) model, focus on how the upper-layer responsibilities are grouped. In OSI, the Presentation layer and Session layer are distinct layers, but in the classic TCP/IP model these responsibilities are not separated into two independent layers; instead, they are typically folded into the Application layer. Therefore, the OSI layers that are additional relative to TCP/IP are the Presentation layer and Session layer—i.e., (iv) Both session layer and presentation layer.

A useful way to remember this mapping is: OSI splits “application-side” concerns into finer-grained layers, while TCP/IP combines them.

Key keyword: OSI layer that handles data representation (e.g., encoding/format) and often encryption/compression.
Key keyword: OSI layer that manages establishment, maintenance, and termination of communication sessions.
Key keyword: Internet protocol stack that groups application-side functions mostly under the Application layer.

Note: Different textbooks sometimes draw the mapping slightly differently, but the standard conceptual conclusion remains: OSI’s extra separation at the top corresponds to Presentation + Session being “combined” into Application in TCP/IP.

OSI Model Explained (Layers & Functions)

OSI upper layers (what they do)

In the OSI model, the Presentation layer and Session layer provide services beyond “pure application logic”:

  • keyword: converts between formats/encodings and can perform encryption/decryption or data compression.
  • keyword: establishes sessions, coordinates dialog control, and handles session synchronization and orderly termination.
  • keyword: provides network services that applications use (e.g., email, web, file transfer).

This separation is why OSI has more conceptual layers than TCP/IP.

TCP/IP upper layers (how it groups responsibilities)

In the TCP/IP model, the top is commonly represented as fewer layers:

  • Application layer: includes functions that OSI distributes among Application + Presentation + Session.
  • TCP/IP emphasizes transport and internetworking layers (Transport and Internet) while bundling many application-side concerns together.

So, OSI’s Presentation and Session layers are effectively “additional” because TCP/IP does not present them as separate layers.

Decide which OSI layer(s) are added vs TCP/IP

  1. 1
    Step 1

    OSI explicitly defines Presentation and Session as separate layers.

  2. 2
    Step 2

    TCP/IP groups presentation- and session-like concerns into its Application layer.

  3. 3
    Step 3

    Since TCP/IP does not list separate Presentation and Session layers, these are the additional ones.

  4. 4
    Step 4

    Therefore the correct option is (iv) Both session layer and presentation layer.

Quick memory trick

If OSI says “Presentation” + “Session,” but TCP/IP only shows a single “Application” layer on top, then OSI’s “extra” fine-grained layers are Presentation + Session.

Textbook variations

Some diagrams may label the TCP/IP Application layer as including “presentation/session functions.” So the conceptual mapping is consistent even if the diagram wording differs.

Layer grouping idea (OSI splits more; TCP/IP groups more)

Separate layers

OSI

Application, Presentation, Session are distinguished."

Grouped layers

TCP/IP

Presentation + Session responsibilities are absorbed into Application."

Exam-style FAQ

OSI upper layers vs TCP/IP grouping (conceptual)

TCP/IP typically groups Presentation + Session into Application.

Knowledge Check

Question 1 of 3
Q1Single choice

This layer is an addition to OSI model when compared with TCP/IP model. Which option is correct?