Gain Reduction for Overshoot Specification in a Unity-Feedback System
We study a unity-feedback control system with open-loop transfer function
For a unit-step input, the peak (percent) overshoot depends on the closed-loop damping ratio of the resulting second-order dynamics. In this design problem, we will enforce that the overshoot decreases from to by scaling the amplifier gain accordingly.
Key relations we will use:
- unity feedback implies the closed-loop characteristic equation is .
- percent overshoot for underdamped second-order systems is where is the damping ratio.
- The given plant/feedback structure yields a standard second-order denominator, from which can be expressed in terms of and .
Mermaid overview of the control loop:
Footnotes
-
Percent overshoot and damping ratio relationship (including inverse formula) - Wikipedia “Damping” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping - Provides PO = 100 exp(−ζπ/√(1−ζ^2)) and ζ inversion formula. ↩
Percent Overshoot & Damping Ratio (Second-Order Systems)
Step 1: Form the unity-feedback closed-loop transfer function
Unity feedback gives the characteristic equation:
Multiply by :
Expand:
Thus the closed-loop transfer function has a denominator proportional to .
To match the standard second-order form
divide by :
Now compare coefficients:
From , we get . Then
Key takeaway:
- damping ratio is inversely proportional to :
This relation lets us compute the ratio once we find and from the overshoot specs.
Compute damping ratios from the percent overshoot formula
- 1Step 1
For an underdamped second-order step response, PO (decimal percent) satisfies PO = .
Footnotes
-
Percent overshoot and damping ratio relationship (including inverse formula) - Wikipedia “Damping” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping - Provides PO = 100 exp(−ζπ/√(1−ζ^2)) and ζ inversion formula. ↩
-
- 2Step 2
For PO = and PO = : and .
- 3Step 3
Footnotes
-
Percent overshoot and damping ratio relationship (including inverse formula) - Wikipedia “Damping” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping - Provides PO = 100 exp(−ζπ/√(1−ζ^2)) and ζ inversion formula. ↩
-
- 4Step 4
Let . Then .
- 5Step 5
Let . Then .
Step 2: Relate gain ratio to damping ratio
We derived:
With fixed, this implies:
Therefore,
Insert the computed values:
So the amplifier gain should be reduced to about of its original value, i.e., reduced by a factor:
Equivalently, it is reduced by about:
Why overshoot targets ζ
For standard underdamped second-order responses, peak overshoot depends only on the damping ratio , via PO . Frequency scale cancels out for PO, so we only need .
Footnotes
-
Percent overshoot and damping ratio relationship (including inverse formula) - Wikipedia “Damping” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping - Provides PO = 100 exp(−ζπ/√(1−ζ^2)) and ζ inversion formula. ↩
Underdamped requirement
The overshoot formula used is for underdamped systems (). Here both computed and satisfy , so the model is consistent .
Footnotes
-
Percent overshoot and damping ratio relationship (including inverse formula) - Wikipedia “Damping” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping - Provides PO = 100 exp(−ζπ/√(1−ζ^2)) and ζ inversion formula. ↩
Damping ratio & gain scaling for overshoot reduction
From PO = 75% to PO = 25% (T fixed).
Common checks and derived formulas
Key Concepts Flashcards
Knowledge Check
For the given system with unity feedback, which characteristic equation is correct?